Use web feeds!

Web feeds are data formats used to provide users with updates through web syndication. Websites can use web feeds to post their content in a format that allows users to easily check for updates regularly. Examples of web feeds are Atom, RSS or JSON Feed.

The most popular is RSS, you have probably heard of it. Until a year ago, RSS to me was an old technology that some people used to get their news on an ugly feed reader. I thought this technology was obsolete because of the couple silos that monopolize online social interactions. Well, this couldn't be further from the truth. Web feeds are definitely not obsolete, and those "ugly readers" I remembered were just particular examples, but there are a lot of beautiful readers out there. There's also a lot of people that want to be able to get updates on different sites without the need to have an account on a centralized third-party service.

Let's see the benefits of using web feeds.

Web decentralization

Web feeds allow for web syndication, which is key in order to decentralize the web. When you follow a blog or a podcast through web feeds, neither you nor the content creator rely on a third party to update you on the content. There's no need to post a new update on a social platform. When new content is published, the subscribers will see the updates coming directly from the original domain.

Centralized updates

Wait, what?! Well, not as in "centralized service", but as in you get all the updates from all these different websites in one app or program. Web feeds allow the subscriber to see all the content updates in one place, so convenient! Without it, we probably would have to check every single website regularly to see if new content was published (or maybe design a bot that would do that for us, but still, annoying).

Control over content posting

By not relying on a third party for content updates, creators have full control over their communication channel. It will never shut down—disappearing along with the subscribers—, unless the creator decides to do so. There also won't be any magical algorithms that decide which updates are worth showing to their subscribers and which ones are not, or even which ones magically get deleted. Subscribers get all of them.

Control over the consumption of content

By using web feed readers, you can configure a dark theme, a bigger font, etc. You can even have the content read to you. There are accessibility features for webpages as well, but when using a web feed it is so much easier, since the content is presented in a standardized format. It is also in the user's power to filter the content any way they want. Do you want to block certain words? Done!

Privacy for the subscriber

There's no need to insist on the fact that silos are a privacy nightmare. But there's more. If you are reading a web feed, there are no advertisements tracking you and there are no tracking pixels. You read the content (or not) whenever you want, without anybody tracking you.

The disadvantages

So, why doesn't everyone use it? First of all, most of the blogs I read have a web feed, Mastodon does too, as well as Youtube1. However, you cannot comment through a feed reader and you normally don't see the "related content" and all those extra features we can find on a website2. There is also an entry barrier: it takes a couple fewer seconds to hit subscribe/follow than to look for the web feed and open your web feed reader to add it.

Web feeds also work best when you have a lot of sites that publish every once in a while. If you subscribe to 500 sites that publish hourly, it can get overwhelming with the common feed readers (although there are probably others that are ready for this kind of usage and make it nice).

Finally, web feeds avoid tracking subscribers and the embedding of adds. That can be an inconvenience to the content owner, who might want to do that. Although I am not a fan of it, it is definitely something that happens. If that is your case, there is an easy solution: don't post the content on the web feed. Simply put your title and a two-line summary of the content. Subscribers can then press on the link and open the content. This way you keep your subscribers up to date, without losing the capacity to embed ads.

Why e-mail newsletters are not a web feed substitute

E-mail newsletters have that decentralized component, you don't depend on a centralized service (although most of them do, but that isn't necessary). However they are definitely not private. First of all, you need to give out your e-mail address, who knows if it will end up on a spam list? If you want to unsubscribe you have to go to their website and hope for them to erase your data and not only archive it somewhere. Finally, e-newsletters can—and most do—contain tracking pixels, so they can know how many times a subscriber accesses the content and when.

If you have an e-newsletter but don't have a website for it, then you have a reasonable excuse not to have a feed (although you should definitely make a website!). If you post your newsletter online, then add a web feed! It is very easy!

Fun fact!

As a matter of fact, I started writing a post on RSS feeds about three weeks ago. When writing why you should add the whole content on your RSS feed and not only a summary, I remembered that to do so, I did a little hack. I would put the whole content in the description tag, which was designed for a brief summary. That got me thinking, I wanted to follow the standards. After searching for a while, I discovered you can use the content:encoded tag, which is exactly what I needed, but there where other tags that also seemed to do the same. After some more research, I discovered RSS has some standardization issues. So I looked at the alternative I had heard about before: Atom. Apparently, Atom arose from the need to standardize RSS, with a new design that wouldn't have backward compatibility. Atom is very similar to RSS, but I like the fact that there is one clear specification (apparently it has other cool features in case you are interested, but I didn't look into them much).

After reading about this I learned how it worked and implemented for my blog's feed (since Hugo's default is RSS). So if you use my web feed, you are now retrieving an Atom feed!

As you probably figured my first draft had a different approach than the final post. This was partially because shortly after I started writing, this post came out so I changed my focus a bit. If you don't post your full content on your web feed, read it!

  1. If you want to follow people from other big social media sites, there are ways to do so! Use an instance of Nitter for Twitter or an instance of Bibliogram for Instagram. If you have other sites in mind, look around the Internet, someone probably implemented a web feed for it. 

  2. This is actually seen as a good thing most of the time, as you get to consume the content without any distractions.